The Economic Value of Law Degree

Step One: Get JD, preferably Hahvahd as Simkovic Step Two: Publish BS Studies on the Value of JD Step Three: Win The decision to attend law school in the 21st century requires an increasing financial investment, but very little information about the value of a legal education is available to prospective law students. Prospects use a variety of tools provided by schools and third parties when trying to make an informed decision about which law school they want to attend. This article provides an overview of the information available on an important segment of the value analysis: post-graduation employment outcomes. One of the most pressing problems with today`s access to information is the ability to hide results in aggregate statistical form. Almost every tool allows for this behavior, which, while misleading, is often consistent with current standards of the ABA and U.S. news reporting. In this article, we propose a new standard for accounting for employment based on compromise. It is our hope that this standard will allow interested parties to take a detailed and holistic view of the various employment opportunities offered by the various law schools. Over time, improved transparency in U.S. legal institutions may produce generations of lawyers who have been better informed about the range of jobs achievable with a law degree. At first, I thought the title postulated that the value of a law degree was negative $1 million.

It`s really interesting! It`s good to see positive information about the value of a law degree. It`s something we all knew, but it`s certainly getting lost in all the bad press that law school is getting these days. Thanks for sharing. I agree with you. A law degree has a very big job advantage over those who only have a bachelor`s degree. As the population grows, so does the number of people in need of legal assistance. Instead of charging interest on law school student loans, perhaps the U.S. Treasury would be better off taking a stake in law degrees! After looking at sorting out observable skills, we find that a law degree is associated with a 60% increase in monthly income and a 50% increase in median hourly wages.

The average annual income premium for a law school is approximately $53,300 in 2012. The income premium for the right is cyclical and the last few years are in line with historical norms. We estimate that the lifetime median value of a law degree before tax is about $1,000,000. Lawyers and journalists have compiled statistics that supposedly show that enrollment in law school is irrational. We look at the economic value of a law degree and find the opposite: given the current level of education, the average annual bonuses and even the 25th percentile justify enrollment. For most law school graduates, the net present value of a law degree typically exceeds its cost by hundreds of thousands of dollars. We enhance previous education by tracking the lifetime income of a broad sample of law graduates. Previous studies have focused on entry-level salaries, generic professional degrees, or the subset of law graduates practicing law. We also take into account the risk of unemployment and disability, rather than taking on a continuous full-time job.

Lawyers and journalists have compiled statistics that supposedly show that enrollment in law school is irrational. We look at the economic value of a law degree and find the opposite: given the current level of education, the average annual bonuses and even the 25th percentile justify enrollment. For most law school graduates, the net present value of a law degree typically exceeds its cost by hundreds of thousands of dollars. We enhance previous education by tracking the lifetime income of a broad sample of law graduates. Previous studies have focused on entry-level salaries, generic professional degrees, or the subset of law graduates practicing law. We also take into account the risk of unemployment and disability, rather than taking on a continuous full-time job. After looking at sorting out observable skills, we find that a law degree is associated with a 60% increase in monthly income and a 50% increase in median hourly wages. The average annual income premium for a law school is approximately $53,300 in 2012. The income premium for the right is cyclical and the last few years are in line with historical norms.

We estimate that the lifetime median value of a law degree before tax is about $1,000,000. Explorations: The UC Davis Undergraduate Research Journal. I stopped including my JD on my resume long ago after coming to a completely different conclusion than the authors. Median increase in career income for JD vs BA = $610 pre-tax 2012 dollars Some quick calculations from their reported numbers (warning, I haven`t read the full study): Radical skepticism? Do you do my own study? My criticism was well-founded and thoughtful. My fourth criticism was certainly desirable. If one can only criticize the work with new studies, we should probably close the entire network of blogs of law professors and similarly end academic symposia. For the sake of jurisprudence, I hope none of you are professors anywhere. (1) Why do the authors assume that graduates before 2008 are similar to graduates after 2008? The market gave up this year and it`s logical to assume that graduates would have a harder time finding their first job after 2008. Many university graduates have been excluded from the legal market. You may never get a legal job.

(2) The comparison does not seem correct. Do not compare JDs with BS or BAs. Compare JDs with other postgraduate alternatives. (3) There is an inherent selection bias. Even fourth-level law schools reject candidates for risk of default. The JDs will, on average, be slightly brighter than the BA and BS pool. (4) Your best bet is to compare people who have been accepted to law school and refuse to participate with those who have been accepted and decide to leave. It is probably impossible. With the passage of House Bill 1403 in 2001, Texas became the first state to pass laws allowing undocumented students to qualify for state tuition at public colleges and universities.

However, allowing students who are not legally resident in the United States to pay tuition is a highly controversial and politically charged issue that is the source of ongoing debate. Almost without exception, there are calls during every legislature to reverse the state`s tuition policy. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of Texas HB 1403 to determine whether the policy is socially beneficial. Given that approximately 80% of the undocumented population in the United States is Hispanic, the analysis focuses specifically on the costs and benefits of providing this incentive to Hispanic students. This study examines three costs and three benefits of the policy. Costs include loss of tuition, increased financial support and admissions administration costs, as well as opportunity costs for loss of income upon enrollment. The benefits of this policy are higher wages, lower incarceration costs and reduced public health spending. The cost-benefit analysis has shown that the policy is socially beneficial to the state. Therefore, this document recommends that tuition be maintained in Texas. HLS Programme on Legal Profession Research Paper No. 2013-6 Econometric modelling: Microeconometric studies in health, education and housing markets Update #1: Michael Simkovic (Seton Hall), Above the Law Must Read More Three questions/comments without diving into the study: Cost of 3 years of tuition = $180,000 after tax 2012 dollars A PowerPoint presentation version of this article is available at: ssrn.com/abstract=2270175.

Abstract: Human capital theory suggests that individuals evaluate costs and benefits when considering further education. On the cost side, these include direct costs (such as tuition and textbooks) and indirect costs (which are largely incurred as lost revenue). On the benefit side, individuals should take into account the additional income that comes from higher education. Net increase in after-tax lifetime income – median JD vs. BA: $100,000. If I do it again with the JD-, which is probably more accurate because a median BA is probably about a 25th percentile JD (given the difference between the average UG-GPA and LSAT scores between the two groups). If we assume that the median income of Young Women is approximated by the cumulative grade point average/median LSAT of an intermediate law school (~100 ranked schools), we are talking about a person with a cumulative average of 3.4 and a LSAT of 157 (70th percentile). The median GPA of a bachelor`s degree holder in the United States is probably closer to 3.1-3.2, and the LSAT average is 151. So I think we can safely assume that the median JD is more qualified than the median university degree. But if you`re still engaged in radical skepticism, be sure to bring that to scam claims.

Hey HTA, at points 3 and 4: They controlled like the best labor economists the “sorting of skills”. www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/07/18/ignore-the-haters-law-school-is-totally-worth-the-cash/ interest cost on 250,000 loans (I include interest on the loan to cover the cost of living at LS in the amount of $70,000, but not the LOC itself) in 2012 dollars (assuming 7% interest, minus 2% for inflation, repayment over 20 years according to monthly repayment schedule) = median after-tax profit increase of $145,000 (Take the 30% rate on Income at) = $425,000 HTA – perhaps you should do your own study if you do not agree with the methodology.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.